The Adweek report: What did advertisers claim Google discussed?

Details of the alleged advertiser briefings

According to agency buyers, Google representatives held separate calls with at least two advertising clients in early December describing a potential roadmap to place ads within Gemini sometime in 2026. Buyers said the briefings were high level, short on technical specifics, and did not include prototypes, format mockups, or pricing frameworks. They emphasized these were exploratory talks rather than a formal product announcement.

Importantly, buyers characterized the initiative as distinct from ads in AI Overviews and AI Mode. The pitch, as described to them, positioned Gemini as a separate surface with its own monetization opportunity once the product matured and usage patterns stabilized.

Gemini’s scale is part of the allure. By October 2025, the app had reached roughly 650 million monthly active users, up from about 450 million in July, buoyed by viral features like the Nano Banana image generator. For advertisers hungry for fresh reach, that audience is hard to ignore.

How is that different from Google’s current AI ad tests?

Google has already woven ads into AI Overviews in English across the United States and has been expanding to more English-speaking markets. AI Mode, launched in March 2025 as a separate AI-powered search experience, is also in testing with ad placements. Gemini, however, has remained ad-free. The reported briefings suggested that if ads were to come to Gemini, they would represent a new revenue stream beyond existing AI search initiatives.

Related reading on Gemini’s capabilities and how people actually use it today can be found here: Gemini 3 capabilities and an updated breakdown Gemini 3 productivity tips.

What is Google’s official response?

Dan Taylor’s public rebuttal on X

Within hours of the report, Dan Taylor, Google’s VP of Global Ads, posted a pointed rebuttal on X. He said the story was inaccurate, based on “uninformed, anonymous sources,” and stressed that there are no ads in the Gemini app and no current plans to change that. Google’s AdsLiaison account amplified the message and redirected attention to where the company is actively monetizing AI today: AI Overviews and AI Mode.

The phrasing raised eyebrows among marketers. “No current plans” is not the same as “never,” and analysts immediately parsed the language for wiggle room. Some industry watchers argued that ads feel inevitable for a product at Gemini’s scale, with one media analyst remarking that “there exists no other way to monetize Gemini.”

Where is Google monetizing AI right now?

Google’s public position is straightforward. It is showing ads in AI Overviews in English in the US and expanding from there. It is running tests within AI Mode. And it is not putting ads inside the Gemini app. That last part is the sticking point, and the reason this story refuses to die. The company’s focus on search-related AI monetization shows a clear willingness to blend ads and generative responses. Whether that logic eventually extends to Gemini remains the question.

How did Adweek defend its reporting?

Adweek’s response and the sourcing question

After Google’s rebuttal, Adweek stood by its story, saying multiple advertisers confirmed that Google had discussed bringing ads to Gemini and that some of those sources were willing to go on the record. The publication also pointed to earlier comments from CEO Sundar Pichai about having “very good ideas” for native ad formats in Gemini as circumstantial support for long-term plans. In Adweek’s telling, Google’s statements address the present tense, while its reporting describes forward-looking conversations about potential 2026 plans.

The credibility wrinkle here matters. The original account leaned on buyers who requested anonymity to discuss private meetings, but subsequent clarifications note that not all sources were anonymous. That shift strengthens the case that some form of exploratory conversation did occur, even if productization is far from settled.

Why is monetizing AI chatbots so hard—and so tempting?

The AI monetization imperative

Large language models are expensive to run. Serving hundreds of millions of queries requires enormous compute and energy, and the bill runs high. With Gemini’s audience now in the hundreds of millions, the commercial temptation is obvious. Google also has something many rivals lack: a mature ad marketplace and deep relationships with buyers who are constantly seeking new surfaces when traditional channels get crowded.

Competitive dynamics and rival strategies

The competitive pressure is not theoretical. OpenAI has faced its own internal urgency about product quality and priorities, with reports of a “code red” moment in early December and delays to some revenue initiatives, including advertising, to focus on core ChatGPT improvements. Meanwhile, rumors have swirled around potential ad experiments in AI chat apps generally, as marketers look for new placements that blend utility and brand messaging. When mainstream AI services wobble, as they did during a recent ChatGPT outage that rippled through startups dependent on the API, advertisers and developers get a stark reminder that resilience and diversified channels matter. More on that here: ChatGPT outage impacts.

How are advertisers reacting?

The contradiction between reported advertiser briefings and Google’s public denial creates real planning headaches. Budgeting for 2026 is underway. Even early speculation about ads inside Gemini is enough to spark scenario planning at agencies. Marketers want to be ready if and when Gemini surfaces open up. They also do not want to overcommit to channels that may not exist on the timelines they heard about in December.

The utility versus platform debate

This is the heart of it. Keeping Gemini ad-free positions it as a pure, user-first tool, distinct from Google’s AI search experiences. Introducing ads could nudge it toward a hybrid model that risks friction in a product prized for seamless conversation. The debate is not going away. Only the timeline seems to be moving as financial and competitive pressures slowly tighten.

What is the timeline of events—and how should we read the signals?

Key dates

  • December 2, 2025: OpenAI’s leadership signals “code red,” reportedly delaying ad efforts to focus on core product improvements.
  • December 8, 2025: Adweek reports Google discussed 2026 Gemini ad plans with advertisers during recent calls.
  • December 8, 2025, evening: Google’s Dan Taylor posts a public denial on X, stating there are no ads in Gemini and no current plans to change that.
  • Following days: Coverage expands with additional context about Adweek’s sourcing and prior executive comments about native ad ideas.

Interpreting the contradiction

Two things can be true at once. Exploratory conversations might have happened at a working level while leadership opted not to lock plans, or simply chose not to announce them yet. The careful “current plans” wording preserves flexibility. The rapid, coordinated denial looks like narrative management while the business weighs product purity against revenue needs. None of that guarantees ads are coming to Gemini in 2026. It does suggest the door is open later if Google believes it can design ad formats that do not break the experience.

How should advertisers prepare in the meantime?

Until Google offers clarity, teams can make contingency plans without overcommitting. A pragmatic approach looks like this.

  1. Map budgets across existing AI surfaces where ads already run, including AI Overviews and AI Mode, and set aside a flexible reserve for new AI channels.
  2. Define success metrics that would justify experiments inside a chatbot environment, such as assist rate, lead quality, and cost per resolved intent.
  3. Develop creative that feels native to conversational flows, like short, helpful snippets with clear opt-ins rather than interruptive banners.
  4. Pilot measurement frameworks that blend search-style attribution with chatbot interaction analytics so tests can scale quickly if greenlit.