I Used Gemini, Comet, and Atlas. The Good, The Good, and The Good of These Agentic Browsers
Agentic browsers are shifting the web from passive pages to active partners. Google’s Gemini in Chrome feels like a built-in copilot for work, Perplexity’s Comet zeros in on verified answers with sources, and OpenAI’s Atlas runs autonomous research in the background. The short version is simple: they already save real time, even as privacy controls and guardrails continue to mature.
- Agentic browsing moves from search to task completion across tabs, docs, and apps.
- Gemini in Chrome is deeply woven into workflows, summarizing, organizing, and drafting with context.
- Perplexity’s Comet leads with verifiable synthesis, returning cited sources and reasoning traces.
- OpenAI’s Atlas behaves like a scout, exploring and assembling multi-step research autonomously.
- Privacy and security need ongoing attention, but the productivity gains are already tangible.
A new era of agentic browsing
For decades, the browser was a window and we did the work. Now the window thinks with us. The shift to agentic browsing is obvious in three products shaping the conversation: Google’s Gemini in Chrome, Perplexity’s Comet, and OpenAI’s Atlas. Together they signal a move from “open a tab and search” to “state a goal and get progress.” Understanding the arrival of the agent economy helps explain why this is happening so fast.
Gemini in Chrome changes workflow
Gemini is not a bolt-on chatbot. It sits inside Chrome and quietly does the heavy lifting. Summaries of long pages, quick outlines from a sea of tabs, email drafts based on what you’re reading, suggestions for the next step in a project—this is the day-to-day feel. When Gemini senses a pattern in your work, it helps organize research into groups and keeps context handy so you do not start from zero every time.
The pitch from Google is straightforward: a research partner that speeds through routine steps and hands you a clean brief or draft. For anyone juggling documents, spreadsheets, and a dozen tabs, that kind of ambient assistance is the difference between “busy” and “productive.” If you want the broader context on why this approach matters, the deep-dive on the agent economy is a solid starting point.
Recommended tech
For a tighter loop between hardware and AI assistance, The TechBull suggests trying the Google Pixel 9a with Gemini. The experience feels immediate across tasks like browsing, photos, and daily planning.

Perplexity’s Comet focuses on credible answers
Comet approaches the problem from the other side. Instead of throwing a mountain of links at you, it reads broadly, compares claims, and returns a single answer with citations. You see the reasoning and can jump straight into the sources. For journalists, students, analysts—anyone who needs to trust what they read—this is the feature that stands out.
In practical use, Comet’s transparency builds confidence. When sources disagree, it highlights the ambiguity and explains why. That design choice helps users understand what works when validating information online. If you want to put it to the test, you can try Perplexity’s Comet and see how it cites and synthesizes across the open web.
OpenAI’s Atlas leans into autonomous exploration
Atlas takes the most ambitious swing. Give it a goal and it goes to work, traversing sites, clicking through pages, comparing details, and assembling a coherent brief. It behaves more like a research aide than a search box, surfacing insights rather than just URLs. Ask for a travel plan, a vendor comparison, or a literature scan, and it maps out the territory, then distills what matters.
There is also active work across the industry on systems that flag suspect claims and low-quality sources as they go. The aim is to help users separate signal from noise as autonomous agents read more of the web on our behalf. For the broader market context around this product, see the overview on why everyone is buzzing about the new AI browser.
Security and trust in autonomous browsing
Power brings new responsibilities. Agentic systems read, reason, and sometimes act in your workspace, which means data handling practices matter. Users need clarity on what runs locally, what is sent to the cloud, and how long histories are kept. Across the sector you will see controls for disabling activity logs, on-device processing for sensitive tasks, and clearer notices when data leaves the machine.
This is a moving target. As features accelerate, so do the threats. The rise of AI-driven cyberattacks makes it even more important to pick tools with robust security options and to review settings periodically. The upside is huge, but best practice is to keep a hand on the wheel: verify sources, review drafts, and set guardrails that match the sensitivity of your work.

What the market is seeing
Early users talk about big time savings and fewer tab spirals. There are also moments where agents chase tangents or over-edit drafts, which is part of the learning curve. The best results tend to come from clear goals and short, concrete instructions. Enterprises and security teams, meanwhile, are piloting with defined scopes, tight data policies, and audit trails.
How to choose an agentic browser
- Define the job to be done. If you live in docs and email, Gemini’s in-browser context might fit. If you need verified answers, Comet’s citations help. If you want multi-step research, Atlas-style autonomy is the appeal.
- Decide your data stance. Review privacy controls, on-device options, and org policies before switching default tools.
- Start with one workflow. Pick a recurring task like weekly research, outreach, or report prep. Measure time saved and quality.
- Set guardrails. Limit domains, require citations for claims, and keep a quick checklist for human review before publishing.
- Iterate. Tune prompts and settings, then expand to the next workflow once results are consistent.
The good, the good, and the good
It is easy to focus on risks with any new platform, but the benefits here are hard to ignore. Gemini streamlines messy work, Comet elevates rigor with transparent sourcing, and Atlas tackles multi-step research so you can focus on decisions. The experience already feels like a different internet. The stadium is being rebuilt, and for now, the scoreboard reads the same three words: clear, fast, helpful.
FAQ
What is an agentic browser?
It is a browser that understands goals and takes actions to help you complete tasks, from summarizing pages to organizing tabs and running multi-step research.
How do Gemini, Comet, and Atlas differ?
Gemini integrates into Chrome to assist with work in context, Comet focuses on credible synthesis with citations, and Atlas emphasizes autonomous exploration to assemble research and briefs.
Are agentic browsers safe for sensitive work?
They offer controls for history, permissions, and sometimes on-device processing. Review settings and your organization’s policies, and verify outputs before sharing.
Do agentic browsers replace search engines?
They sit on top of search and reading. You still reach the open web, but the agent filters, summarizes, and connects steps so you spend less time clicking and more time deciding.
Will these tools work on mobile?
Availability varies by product and region. Some features are already mobile-friendly, while others are rolling out. Check the latest details from each provider.
How can I try them today?
Explore Gemini features in Chrome, test Comet’s cited answers via Perplexity, and follow updates on Atlas from OpenAI. For broader context, read our coverage of the new AI browser and the shift to the agent economy.




